Court of Appeal Wellington
CA 433/2008; [2009] NZCA 12
23 October 2008; 17 February 2009
Glazebrook, O’Regan and Arnold JJ
CA 433/2008; [2009] NZCA 12
23 October 2008; 17 February 2009
Glazebrook, O’Regan and Arnold JJ
Constitutional law — New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 — Bill of Rights 1688 (Imp) — Parliament — Principle of comity — Whether Attorney-General’s duty to report apparent inconsistencies with New Zealand Bill of Rights Act reviewable — Whether Attorney-General’s duty to report apparent inconsistencies with New Zealand Bill of Rights Act arises only on introduction — Availability of declarations of inconsistency between statute and New Zealand Bill of Rights Act — Bill of Rights 1688 (Imp), art 9 — New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 7.
Judicial review — Justiciability — Whether Attorney-General’s duty to report apparent inconsistencies with New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 reviewable.
Judicial review — Remedies — Availability of declarations of inconsistency between statute and New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990.
Statutes — Interpretation — New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 — Whether Attorney-General’s duty to report to Parliament Bills’ apparent inconsistencies with New Zealand Bill of Rights Act arises only on introduction — New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 7.
Loading... Please wait...
