Attorney-General v Chapman - [2012] 1 NZLR 462

Constitutional law — Courts and tribunals — Claims of breach of New Zealand Bill of Rights Act by judiciary — Whether Court had jurisdiction to hear claim — Whether public law compensation available against Attorney-General for breaches by judiciary — New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, ss 25 and 27.

Constitutional law — Crown immunities and privileges — Claims of breach of Bill of Rights Act by judiciary — Whether Court had jurisdiction to hear claim — Whether public law compensation available for breaches by judiciary — New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, ss 25 and 27.

Constitutional law — New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 — Claims of breach of New Zealand Bill of Rights Act by judiciary — Whether Court had jurisdiction to hear claim — Whether public law compensation available for breaches by judiciary — New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, ss 25 and 27.