Site Information

 Loading... Please wait...

B (SC12/2013) v R - [2014] 1 NZLR 261

$30.00

Supreme Court of New Zealand Wellington
SC12/2013; [2013] NZSC 151
15 August; 19 December 2013
Elias CJ, McG rath, William Young, Glazebrook and Arnold JJ
Criminal practice and procedure — Juries — Jury unable to agree — Standard direction — Reference to “give and take” replaced — “Discussion, argument and listening with an open mind to the opinion of others” — Observation.
Criminal practice and procedure — Juries — Whether verdicts inconsistent in fact or law — Whether apparently inconsistent verdicts motivated by sense of justice — Whether convictions unreasonable.
Evidence — Admissibility — Complainant in sexual offence case — Evidence of previous incident of not necessarily sexual nature — Whether evidence of reputation in sexual matters — Whether evidence of previous sexual experience — Whether relevant in view of admission by complainant — Evidence Act 2006, ss 40 and 44(1), (2) and (3).
Evidence — Relevance — Observation as to benefit of doubt to defendant on evidence led by defence — Scrutiny of such evidence for relevance when other interests engaged.

Find Similar Products by Courts