Loading... Please wait...
Privy Council Wellington
[2003] UKPC 38
4, 5, 6 February; 19 May 2003
Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough, Lord Millett, Lord Scott of Foscote and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe
[2003] UKPC 38
4, 5, 6 February; 19 May 2003
Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hobhouse of Woodborough, Lord Millett, Lord Scott of Foscote and Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe
Law practitioners — Discipline — Privilege — Law firm subject of complaint also party to litigation — Whether district law society could order production of documents subject to privilege in legal proceeding — Law Practitioners Act 1982, ss 101, 126 and 127.
Evidence — Privilege — Law firm subject of complaint also party to litigation — Whether district law society could order production of documents subject to privilege in legal proceeding — Law Practitioners Act 1982, ss 101, 126 and 127.
Statutes — Interpretation — Necessary implication — Law Practitioners Act 1982, s 101(3)(d).