Loading... Please wait...
Supreme Court of New Zealand Wellington
[2005] NZSC 34
8 April; 16 June 2005
Elias CJ, Gault, Keith, Blanchard and Tipping JJ
[2005] NZSC 34
8 April; 16 June 2005
Elias CJ, Gault, Keith, Blanchard and Tipping JJ
Employment law — Employee/contractor distinction — Appeal to Court of Appeal — Whether error of law demonstrated — Whether determination of law or of fact and law — Whether contract comprehensive and accurate description of real nature of relationship — Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 6 and 214.
Employment law — Appeal to Court of Appeal — Whether error of law demonstrated — Whether determination of law or of fact and law — Whether contract comprehensive and accurate description of real nature of relationship — Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 6 and 214.
Practice and procedure — Appeals to Court of Appeal — Appeal on point of law only — Whether error of law demonstrated — Whether determination of law or of fact and law — Whether contract comprehensive and accurate description of real nature of relationship — When error of fact rendered decision insupportable and error of law — Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 6 and 214.
Administrative law — Judicial review — Whether determination of law or of fact and law — When error of fact rendered decision insupportable and error of law — Employment Relations Act 2000, ss 6 and 214.