Site Information

 Loading... Please wait...

Garrett v Attorney-General - [1993] 3 NZLR 600

$30.00

High Court Wellington
23 February; 3 May 1993
Anderson J
Tort — Misfeasance in public office — Elements of tort — Failure of police to investigate complaint of rape — Public duty of police to exercise power for public good — Whether suppression of complaint to protect reputation of police within power of police — Meaning of malice in tort of misfeasance in public office.
Practice and procedure — Striking out proceedings — Whether claim for misfeasance in public office tenable — Prolixity of statement of claim — Need for reasonable particularity — Whether claim for damages under various heads should be pleaded separately — High Court Rules, RR 108 and 185(4).
Practice and procedure — Pleadings — Damages — Misfeasance in public office — Whether damages available for distress — Whether discrete sums can be claimed for general damages, aggravated damages and exemplary damages.
Damages — Pleadings — Whether discrete sums can be claimed for general damages, aggravated damages and exemplary damages.

Find Similar Products by Courts