Site Information

 Loading... Please wait...

Hyams v Peterson - [1991] 1 NZLR 711

$30.00

High Court Wellington
4, 5 December 1989; 4 September 1990
Wylie J
Defamation — Pleading, practice and evidence — Striking out action — Whether words complained of capable of being understood to refer to the plaintiff — Whether words complained of reasonably capable of bearing the meanings alleged by the plaintiff.
Defamation — Cause of action — Parliamentary privilege — Subsequent non-defamatory statement — Whether parliamentary statements available for identification of persons referred to in subsequent non-privileged statement.

Find Similar Products by Courts