Court of Appeal Wellington
CA324/2016; [2017] NZCA 20
8, 22 February 2017
Randerson, Miller and Asher JJ
CA324/2016; [2017] NZCA 20
8, 22 February 2017
Randerson, Miller and Asher JJ
Revenue — Income tax — Runway end safety area (RESA) constructed to comply with international standard for international flights — Whether depreciation deductions could be claimed for tax purposes — Whether RESA exception to general rule that land not depreciable property — Whether RESA could be defined as airport runway — Whether RESA hardstanding — Whether RESA might reasonably be expected to decline in value while in use or available for use — “Depreciable property” — “Airport runway” — “Hardstanding” — Civil Aviation Rules, r 139.
Statutes — Interpretation — Consideration of text and purpose — Ordinary meanings — RESA constructed to comply with international standard for international flights — Whether depreciation deductions could be claimed for tax purposes — Whether RESA exception to general rule that land not depreciable property — Whether RESA could be defined as airport runway — Whether RESA hardstanding — Whether RESA might reasonably be expected to decline in value while in use or available for use — “Depreciable property” — “Airport runway” — “Hardstanding” — Income Tax Act 2007, ss EE 6, EE 7, sch 13.
Loading... Please wait...
