R v Accused (CA 57/91) - [1991] 3 NZLR 439

Criminal law — Evidence — Confession — Admissibility — Verbatim account of question and answer conversation concerning alleged drug manufacturing conspiracy recorded on jobsheet — Conversation occurred during and interrupting principal interview concerning fraudulent use of documents which interview was recorded in notebook — Verbatim account not read to or signed by accused — Whether evidence of question and answer conversation concerning drug conspiracy admissible — Crimes Act 1961, s 344A - Judge's Rules 1912, rule (9).