Court of Appeal Wellington
5, 6, 19 August 1996
Richardson P, Gault, Thomas, Keith and Blanchard JJ
5, 6, 19 August 1996
Richardson P, Gault, Thomas, Keith and Blanchard JJ
Criminal practice and procedure — Evidence — Fresh evidence — New interpretation of analysis of results of DNA test — Governor-General's reference of question of conviction to Court of Appeal — Whether (HLA) DQA.1 test effectively excluded appellant as a contributor to material stains on the complainant and her clothing — Whether new evidence could well have led the jury to conclude there was a reasonable doubt as to appellant's guilt — Whether conviction should be quashed or there should be a new trial — Crimes Act 1961, s 406(a).
Evidence — Appeal — Fresh evidence — New interpretation of analysis of results of DNA test — Whether (HLA) DQA.1 test effectively excluded appellant as a contributor to material stains on the complainant and her clothing — Whether new evidence could well have led the jury to conclude there was a reasonable doubt as to appellant's guilt — Whether conviction should be quashed or there should be a new trial — Crimes Act 1961, s 406(a). $13;
Loading... Please wait...
