Site Information

 Loading... Please wait...

R v Hamer - [2003] 3 NZLR 757

$30.00

Court of Appeal Wellington
CA 196/03
22 July, 7 August 2003
Blanchard, Laurenson and Doogue JJ
Evidence — Hearsay — Statement in document — Whether prejudicial effect of admission of statement outweighed probative value or otherwise inadmissible — Evidence Amendment Act (No 2) 1980, ss 3, 18 and 19.

Find Similar Products by Courts