Court of Appeal Wellington
30 July; 30 September 1992
Cooke P, Richardson, Casey, Hardie Boys and Gault JJ
30 July; 30 September 1992
Cooke P, Richardson, Casey, Hardie Boys and Gault JJ
Criminal law — Evidence — Admissibility — Accused advised of right to consult and instruct solicitor (but without addition of "without delay" or words to similar effect) - Accused informed that he was not obliged to make a statement in response to questions — Accused stated that he understood position — Whether proper inference that accused understood his rights — Observations as to requirements of New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 23(1)(b) - New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 23(1)(b).
Loading... Please wait...
