Site Information

 Loading... Please wait...

R v Ram - [2007] 3 NZLR 322

$30.00

Court of Appeal Wellington
CA 230/06 & 231/06; [2007] NZCA 166
20 March; 2 May 2007
William Young P, Hammond and Wilson JJ
Evidence — Admissibility — Accused’s statement to police ruled inadmissible — Whether could be used in cross-examination if accused gave inconsistent evidence — Evidence Act 2006, ss 28, 29 and 30.
Evidence — Cross-examination of accused — Accused’s statement to police ruled inadmissible — Whether could be used in cross-examination if accused gave inconsistent evidence — Evidence Act 2006, ss 28, 29 and 30.

Find Similar Products by Courts