Site Information

 Loading... Please wait...

R v Tait - [1992] 2 NZLR 666

$30.00

Court of Appeal Wellington
26 February; 6 March 1992
Eichelbaum CJ, Casey and Hardie Boys JJ
Criminal practice and procedure — Appeal — Evidence — Sexual offence against child complainant — Admissibility of evidence of psychologist — Whether evidence an expression of opinion about the complainant's credibility — Whether evidence admissible in terms of Evidence Act 1908, s 23G - Fresh evidence — Crown witness offering fresh evidence after hearing evidence of other Crown witness — Whether evidence relevant — Whether inadmissible evidence or fresh evidence would have had any effect on guilty verdicts — Evidence Act 1908, s 23G.

Find Similar Products by Courts