Court of Appeal Wellington
11, 12 November; 18 December 1992
Eichelbaum CJ, Hardie Boys and Holland JJ
11, 12 November; 18 December 1992
Eichelbaum CJ, Hardie Boys and Holland JJ
Criminal law — Evidence — Admissibility — Voice identification — Need for judicial advice as to caution in accepting such evidence — Whether direction sufficient — Whether conviction should be quashed or new trial ordered.
Criminal law — Evidence — Admissibility of statement — Need for evidential foundation to support inference of breach of New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 - Whether evidence unfairly obtained — Crimes Act 1961, s 344D - New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 23(1)(b).
Loading... Please wait...
