Rongonui v R - [2011] 1 NZLR 23

Evidence — Previous consistent statement — Whether rule caught statements accompanying events in question — Whether statements accompanied events in question — Evidence Act 2006, s 35.

Criminal practice and procedure — Witness — Whether witness should have been allowed to refresh memory from document — Leading questions asked of witness — Whether would have been proper exercise of judicial discretion — Evidence Act 2006, s 89(1)(c).