Court of Appeal Wellington
13, 21 March 1984
Woodhouse P, Cooke and Hardie Boys JJ
13, 21 March 1984
Woodhouse P, Cooke and Hardie Boys JJ
Criminal law — Evidence — Lies — Direction — Rape — In his written statement accused stated that complainant had not uttered a word and that by her conduct he knew she was a willing party — At the trial, accused gave evidence that the complainant had verbally consented — Whether Judge should have directed the jury that the accused's alleged lie, if proved, might be explicable for some reason other than guilt.
Loading... Please wait...
